News/Zylo, Flexera, Fullstory, Global Tech Solutions, Torii, Binadox

One-Third of SaaS Spending Is Waste - Average Company Spends $55.8M With Only 54% License Utilization

VirtualAssistantVA Research Team·

The average company now spends $55.8 million annually on SaaS applications, yet only 54% of those licenses are actively used, according to Zylo's 2026 SaaS Management Index. About one-third of that spending vanishes into unused seats, duplicate tools, and auto-renewals that no one remembers approving. With global SaaS spend projected to hit $1.13 trillion by 2032, the waste problem is growing faster than most organizations can contain it.

The irony is that the same companies struggling to control SaaS spending are simultaneously investing in digital transformation. They are buying more tools to become more efficient - and losing efficiency to the unmanaged sprawl of those very tools.

The Scale of SaaS Waste in 2026

Metric Value Source
Average annual SaaS spend per company $55.8 million Zylo 2026 SaaS Management Index
Average license utilization rate 54% Zylo
Estimated waste percentage ~30-33% Multiple sources
Shadow IT as share of total apps ~33% Industry analysis
Global SaaS market projection (2032) $1.13 trillion Market research
Potential savings from optimization Up to 30% Torii, Flexera

For a company spending the average $55.8 million, a 30% waste factor means $16.7 million annually flowing to software that delivers little or no value. Even for smaller businesses, the proportional waste is substantial - a company spending $500,000 on SaaS is likely losing $150,000 to inefficiency.

The Three Pillars of SaaS Waste

1. Unused and Underutilized Licenses

The most straightforward waste category: licenses purchased but not actively used. This includes:

  • Abandoned accounts - Employees who left but whose licenses were never deactivated
  • Underutilized seats - Users who log in rarely or use only a fraction of the tool's capabilities
  • Over-provisioned tiers - Teams on enterprise plans when basic tiers would suffice
  • Forgotten trials - Free trials that converted to paid subscriptions without active cancellation

2. Shadow IT and Duplicate Tools

Shadow IT comprises approximately one-third of a company's applications, creating untracked spending, security risks, and governance problems:

  • Department-level purchases - Teams buying tools without IT approval or visibility
  • Redundant applications - Multiple tools serving the same purpose across different departments
  • Personal preference subscriptions - Individual employees choosing tools outside the approved stack
  • Integration blind spots - Tools that duplicate functionality already available in existing platforms

3. Auto-Renewal and Contract Waste

Subscription management at scale is operationally difficult:

  • Missed renewal dates - Contracts auto-renewing at higher rates without negotiation
  • Unnecessary term extensions - Multi-year commitments for tools that may not be needed
  • Grandfathered pricing losses - Failing to renegotiate as market pricing drops
  • Unused feature upgrades - Paying for capability expansions that no one uses

The 2026 SaaS Optimization Stack

A growing category of SaaS management platforms has emerged to address the waste problem:

Tool Focus Area Key Capability
Zylo Enterprise SaaS management AI-powered spend intelligence
Torii SaaS optimization Usage monitoring and automated workflows
Flexera IT asset management License optimization across software types
Productiv SaaS intelligence Engagement analytics tied to business outcomes
Binadox Cost optimization Real-time spend monitoring and alerts
BetterCloud SaaS operations Security and workflow automation
Vendr SaaS buying Negotiation and procurement optimization
Cledara SaaS control Centralized subscription management

In 2026, these tools are increasingly incorporating AI that moves from simple reporting to prescriptive analytics - recommending the optimal mix of user types based on actual usage patterns and even autonomously negotiating renewals.

Seven Proven Optimization Strategies

Organizations can cut SaaS spend by up to 30 percent without stalling key workflows through these strategies:

1. Conduct a Complete SaaS Audit

Map every application in use across the organization, including shadow IT. This baseline assessment typically reveals 30-50% more applications than leadership expects.

2. Implement Usage Monitoring

Track actual login frequency, feature usage depth, and time-in-app metrics for every licensed tool. Usage data drives evidence-based decisions about which licenses to maintain, downgrade, or eliminate.

3. Consolidate Redundant Tools

Identify overlapping functionality across departments and standardize on a single platform. Common consolidation targets include:

  • Project management (3-4 tools reduced to 1)
  • Communication platforms (multiple chat tools consolidated)
  • Document management (overlapping storage and collaboration tools)
  • Analytics and reporting (department-specific tools replaced with a centralized platform)

4. Right-Size License Tiers

Match subscription tiers to actual usage requirements. Many organizations pay for enterprise features that only power users need, while the majority of users would be fully served by basic or standard plans.

5. Centralize Procurement

Route all SaaS purchases through a centralized approval process that checks for existing tool overlap, negotiates volume pricing, and maintains a master subscription registry.

6. Manage Renewal Cycles Proactively

Build a renewal calendar that triggers review 60-90 days before each renewal date, allowing time for usage assessment, need validation, and price negotiation.

7. Establish SaaS Governance Policies

Create clear policies around tool approval, data security requirements, integration standards, and spend thresholds that require management review.

The Security Dimension

SaaS waste is not just a financial problem. In 2026, SaaS spend management tools are increasingly expected to support security and governance alongside cost optimization:

  • Data exposure risk - Shadow IT applications may not meet security standards
  • Access management - Orphaned accounts create unauthorized access vectors
  • Compliance gaps - Unmanaged tools may violate regulatory requirements
  • Integration vulnerabilities - Unauthorized API connections can expose data

What This Means for Virtual Assistant Services

SaaS spend optimization is an emerging and high-value function for virtual assistant services. The audit, monitoring, and management tasks that drive SaaS savings are precisely the systematic, recurring, detail-oriented work that virtual assistants excel at:

  • Subscription inventory management - Maintaining a complete registry of all SaaS tools, costs, and renewal dates
  • Usage monitoring - Tracking login and feature usage data to identify waste
  • Renewal calendar management - Proactively flagging upcoming renewals for review
  • Vendor communication - Handling subscription changes, downgrades, and cancellations
  • Spend reporting - Generating monthly SaaS spend reports for management review
  • Onboarding and offboarding - Provisioning and deactivating SaaS accounts as team members join or leave

For businesses that cannot justify a dedicated SaaS management platform, a virtual assistant using spreadsheets and basic monitoring tools can capture a significant portion of the 30% savings opportunity. The key is establishing the systematic review cadence that prevents waste from accumulating in the first place.


Explore how businesses use virtual assistant services to delegate tasks and scale operations.

See our guide on hiring a virtual assistant to get started.